The Confederate “Slave Hunt” and the Gettysburg Campaign

ECW welcomes guest author Cooper Wingert

Civil War historians are apt to recite one well-known fact about the battle of Gettysburg—that despite the immense carnage which blanketed the fields outside of the small Pennsylvania borough, the Civil War’s bloodiest battle surprisingly produced just one civilian fatality: Mary Virginia (“Jennie” or “Ginnie”) Wade, a young woman killed by a stray bullet in her back as she was baking bread.

While the story reminds us of the dangers facing civilians who found themselves caught between Union and Confederate forces, it also feeds into a misleading, though common narrative about the Gettysburg Campaign. It implies that violence was limited to the battlefield and the immediate vicinity, and suggests that Wade’s death marks the one, isolated instance in which a Northern civilian came into harm’s way during the 1863 invasion.

For the 5,000-plus African American residents of Adams, Cumberland, Franklin and York counties, the violence of Robert E. Lee’s invasion was anything but constrained. As soon as Brig. Gen. Albert Gallatin Jenkins’s brigade of Virginia cavalry, the vanguard of Lee’s army, entered Franklin County, the Southern horsemen began seizing any and all African Americans they encountered. In Greencastle, town councilman Charles Hartman observed Jenkins’s men “scouring the fields about town” for black residents who had concealed themselves in outlying wheat fields. “Many of them were caught after a desperate chase and being fired at,” Hartman recorded.[1]

The November 8, 1862 edition of Harper’s Weekly depicted a similar Confederate “slave hunt” during the Antietam Campaign. (House Divided Project, Dickinson College)

Similar heartrending scenes transpired throughout Franklin County, the area first traversed by the oncoming Confederate columns. In Chambersburg, Rachel Cormany watched in muted horror as Jenkins’s cavalrymen seized many of her African American neighbors. “O! How it grated on our hearts to have to sit quietly & look at such brutal deeds,” Cormany confided in her diary. Revealingly, she noted a number of freeborn black Pennsylvanians amongst the “droves” of captives—numbering between 25-50, and mostly women and children—being marched through town.[2]

Later, on June 26, Capt. John H. McNeill’s group of mounted Southerners rode into Mercersburg, a small town situated along Franklin County’s western limits. McNeill’s men quickly launched “a regular slave-hunt,” recorded Dr. Philip Schaff, one of the town’s theologians, “which presented the worst spectacle I ever saw in this war.” After threatening to torch “every house which harbored a fugitive slave, and did not deliver him up within twenty minutes,” McNeill and his coterie of horsemen forced their way into any “suspicious” homes, seizing several African Americans, including “a woman and two little children.”

Schaff counted twenty-one black civilians seized by McNeill’s Confederates, who “claimed all these negroes as Virginian slaves.” However, like Cormany in Chambersburg, Schaff was certain “that two or three were born and raised in this neighborhood.” One man, named Sam Brooks, had been employed by Schaff in splitting cords of wood for some time. When the Mercersburg minister pressed one Confederate about the legitimacy of seizing African Americans without bothering to ascertain their legal status, the Southern horseman confidently retorted that “they were only reclaiming their property which we had stolen and harbored.”[3]

Attempts to seize black residents could turn violent at any moment. Chester K. Leach of the 2nd Vermont Infantry, part of John Sedgwick’s Sixth Corps, observed the aftermath of one such confrontation, writing home, “I saw a sight yesterday that beats all I ever saw.” A black man who refused to “go over the river” with Confederate forces during the retreat became the target of a brutal assault. As punishment for resisting, “his breast & bowels were scratched or cut” and “his privates had been cut off.” Leach was among a throng of curious Army of the Potomac infantrymen who crowded into a barn to gawk at the suffering man, who “lay on his back, his legs bent, knees up, & grating his teeth” from the pain.[4]

Members of the Confederate high command were well aware of the rampant slave catching, as historian David Smith has aptly demonstrated in his essay “Race and Retaliation” (2005) and his subsequent book On the Edge of Freedom (2012). Maj. Gen. George Pickett’s division of Virginia infantry was late in reaching the battlefield, in part because the Confederate infantrymen were busy near Chambersburg guarding African American captives, whom they referred to as “contrabands.” Around mid-morning on July 1, Longstreet’s staffer G. Moxley Sorrel fired off a missive to Pickett, directing him to move his division eastward. “The captured contrabands had better be brought along with you for further disposition,” Sorrel instructed, demonstrating that Longstreet and other high-ranking Confederates were aware and complicit in the army’s seizure of black Pennsylvanians.[5]

Castle Thunder Prison in Richmond (Library of Congress)

By a conservative estimate, Lee’s army likely seized at least several hundred black Pennsylvanians during the campaign. The fate of these civilian captives remains largely unknown. Some were reportedly parceled out to slave owners, such as the family of Lucy Buck in Winchester, Virginia. Still others were sent on to Richmond, held at prisons such as Castle Thunder, and put to manual labor. While at least one of the captives was eventually released (a free black man from Mecersburg named Amos Barnes), Confederate Assistant Secretary of War John A. Campbell noted that the Confederate War Department had settled upon “an exceptional policy with regard to him.” (Barnes had allegedly helped Confederates track down and locate fugitive slaves near Mercersburg). However, for the vast majority of Pennsylvania blacks swept up by Lee’s army, there was no such reprieve.[6]

The “slave hunt” has not gone unnoticed by scholars, yet it remains largely outside the standard narrative of the Gettysburg Campaign.[7] When I relate the episode to audiences filled with local history enthusiasts or hardcore Civil War buffs, I usually get the same response—shock and astonishment. In sum, I would encourage historians to work to incorporate the harrowing experience of Pennsylvania’s African American residents into the popular understanding of the Gettysburg Campaign. Too often relegated to a footnote or merely mentioned in passing, it’s a story that absolutely needs to be told.

[1] Charles Hartman Diary, June 22, 1863, Philip Schaff Library, Lancaster Theological Seminary.

[2] Rachel Cormany Diary, June 16, 1863, Valley of the Shadow Project, [WEB].

[3] Philip Schaff Diary, June 25-27, 1863, in The Woman’s Club of Mercersburg, Old Mercersburg, (New York? The Frank Allaben Genealogical Company, 1912), 163-165, [WEB].

[4] Chester K. Leach to Dear Wife, July 15, 1863, in Edward J. Feidner (ed.), Dear Wife: The Civil War Letters of Chester K. Leach, (Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, 2002), 158.

[5] U.S. War Department, The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1881-1901), ser. 1, 51:2, 732-733, [WEB].

[6] Jacob Hoke, Reminiscences of the War; or Incidents which transpired in and about Chambersburg, (Chambersburg, PA: M.A. Foltx, 1884), 144, [WEB]; For more detail and additional primary sources on the fate of African American captives, see this post on Amos Barnes.

[7] For the best treatments to date on the “slave hunt” and its broader ramifications, see Stanley Harrold’s Border War (2010) and David G. Smith’s On the Edge of Freedom (2012).

Cooper Wingert is a historian of the 19th century U.S., focusing on the Civil War, slavery and emancipation. The author of 12 books and numerous articles, his most recent work explores the Underground Railroad and the enforcement of the controversial 1850 Fugitive Slave Law. Previously, his book The Confederate Approach on Harrisburg(History Press, 2012) received the Dr. James I. Robertson, Jr. Literary Prize for the best work in the field of Confederate history, military, political and social. As an undergraduate, Wingert was the recipient of Dickinson College’s William Lenox Avis Prize in U.S. History, and the University of Queensland’s Thomas Morrow Prize in the field of Australian history. He is currently taking his PhD in History at Georgetown University. 

35 Responses to The Confederate “Slave Hunt” and the Gettysburg Campaign

  1. Thank you for shedding more light on this sad but very important part of the Gettysburg campaign. I’ve read about it in Wynstra’s At the Forefront of Lee’s Invasion, but now I think I will check out your book!

  2. I’ve always thought this was well known to students of Gettysburg and the Civil War. Maybe not. See also Kent Masterson Brown’s book Retreat from Gettysburg: Lee, Logistics, and the Pennsylvania Campaign. He documents a number of the takings of blacks by the Confederates throughout the campaign. He also documents a good number of slaves, scores possibly, that had been brought along with Lee’s army, making a run for it while in Pennsylvania or Maryland.

    1. True but I think that while known the subject has generally been treated in pretty succinct fashion. Books like Wynstra’s have focused more specifically on the topic. I’ll wager that the invaders came out ahead in the count at the end of the campaign.

  3. I’m so glad this was posted. Yes, I am shocked and horrified that a component of Lee’s army could do this, but now I have something to counter all the people who want to get outraged over Sherman’s march to the sea or Sheridan’s burning of the Valley. This definitely yanks off the rose-colored glasses of those who thought the Confederates were perfect angels or “victims” during the war. Thank you!

  4. The first I ever heard of this was in reading Coddington’s book on the campaign—that might be the first place it is discussed, and even then only in passing. In the 1990s it was a topic of much heated discussion on various online forms. Because there was so little written about it, I embarked on a modest effort to document the events as best I could, the result being published in the August, 2002 CWTI. David G. Smith’s work is much better than my effort.

  5. How do the Lost Cause, secession wasn’t about slavery, we just wanted to be left alone folks, explain this?

  6. As we #LoseTheLostCause together during this time of national crisis, we must each do our part in combating the spread of history.

    Since the South started the Civil War only to preserve its right to own African slaves, then slavery was the cause of the war. (Or, since you can’t have slavery without slaves, then runaway slaves caused the Civil War by firing upon Charleston from Fort Sumter?)

    The Confederacy was a Slaveocracy, and the Confederate Army was its enforcement agency.

    Wherever the Rebs fought against the Union, they were fighting to keep slaves; and, when they fought where slaves weren’t, they were fighting to force upon the non-slave owners the ownership of some excess supply from the South.

    Lee’s march into Pennsylvania was in lieu of Matthew Fontaine Maury’s “safety valve” plan, advocated to the 1853 South Commercial Convention in Memphis, and very warmly received.

    The plan was a painfully non-benevolent manifestation of the American Colonization Society’s progress, deemed by some as much too slow.

    (Lincoln most admired Clay, who was a leading champion of the Colonization movement. Lincoln never evolved by changing his thinking on Clay’s virtues.)

    So if we can’t tear down the Virginia monument on Confederate Avenue in Gettysburg, let’s at least add much needed Context:

    “This monument celebrates General Robert E. Lee’s push into Pennsylvania with his Army of the Slaveocracy, which fought against the Union so that Gettysburgians could also learn the hardships of owning slaves.”

      1. You, sir, do not have a tight grasp on the English language but you still use it in an embarrassing capacity.

  7. thanks Cooper, great essay … most recent scholarship and popular history about Gettysburg includes this shameful behavior by the ANV and their leaders … but you’re right about the silence from historians of prior generations … and one has to believe that Lee knew as well.

  8. I’ve asked about this before on these boards but never received any response, so I’ll try again. What’s with these “opinion pieces” that don’t offer any means for commentary? I personally don’t care what is presented, but being able to discuss their merits should be available. Below is an example that shows up in the “Recent Comments” section, and is linked above.

    1. What you linked is just a repost of Seidule’s original opinion piece. Perhaps the original article had a comment section? He wrote the initial piece, which linked to this ECW post. All the other links are just pings from other websites that copied the entirety of Seidule’s original, including the hyperlink.

  9. Does anyone have a link to the actual order issued by Lee’s command for the invasion of the North, and does it mention the gathering of “contrabands?”

Please leave a comment and join the discussion!