Book Review: West Virginia’s War: The Civil War in Documents

Kerrigan

West Virginia’s War: The Civil War in Documents. Edited by William Kerrigan. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2025. Softcover, 304 pp., $25.95.

Reviewed by Jon-Erik Gilot

The past quarter century has seen a resurgence in research and publishing on West Virginia’s oft-neglected role in the Civil War. As the only state born of the war, West Virginia offers a fascinating and unique study of the intersections of political, military, and civilian conflict. From campaign and regimental histories to irregular warfare, hostage-taking, constitutional law, and memory studies, recent scholars have either embraced or rejected the longstanding interpretation of the statehood movement – a clash of social, cultural, economic, and political ideals between eastern and western Virginia. Now, a new study seeks to highlight some of the primary sources that both camps have relied on in making their arguments.

West Virginia’s War marks the seventh installment in Ohio University’s The Civil War in Documents series. Stretching back nearly twenty years, the series highlights primary source material, including public documents, letters, diaries, reports, and newspaper articles. While some resources in each book may be well known and oft referenced, readers will also find tantalizing, lesser-utilized material culled from archival collections across the country. Each volume has been edited by a different academic or scholar, ensuring that readers find varying perspectives in each successive book.

This latest volume in the series was capably edited by William Kerrigan, a former longtime professor of history at Muskingum University. The editor opens with a brief introduction addressing the state’s culture, geography, and multilayered historiography. The book is thereafter divided into nine chapters, the first including documents covering Virginia’s western counties during the roughly thirty-year period prior to the Civil War during which the groundwork was laid for intrastate conflict.

Chapter two covers the Revolution of 1860, or the rise of Republicanism even among Virginia’s western counties, where papers like the Daily Intelligencer (Wheeling) championed Abraham Lincoln and the Republican platform. As the only period daily paper in western Virginia, Kerrigan heavily mined the goldmine of reporting and editorials available in the Intelligencer, though not at the expense of coverage from Richmond and other Confederate papers, which are also included.

Additional chapters explore the wartime military and political activity within the area of West Virginia, the statehood movement culminating in West Virginia’s 1863 admission to the Union, the role of women in Civil War West Virginia, and an exploration of the curious history of monumentation and memory in postwar West Virginia, most notably the first statue erected on the West Virginia statehouse grounds – a  controversial 1910 monument to Stonewall Jackson.

Most chapters highlight roughly 12 – 15 documents, with brief editorial comments preceding each entry, contextualizing the author or content for the reader. From soldiers and statesmen, to women, civilians, and the enslaved population, Kerrigan illuminates these disparate voices into a compelling and cohesive narrative.

The book concludes with a nearly 150-year timeline history of statehood events, as well as notes and a bibliography. A seasoned educator, the editor also includes a series of helpful questions (arranged by chapter) that should generate meaningful dialogue both in the classroom and among colleagues seeking a deeper understanding of the Mountain State’s place in Civil War history.

In West Virginia’s War, William Kerrigan’s thoughtfully curated, single-volume collection of primary source records will benefit West Virginia students and researchers for many years to come.



1 Response to Book Review: West Virginia’s War: The Civil War in Documents

  1. Our family on my mother’s side came from Germany in the 1830’s. They settled in what was then the Virginia/Kentucky region, in the Matewan and Pikeville regions. The original name was spelled Sluscher, and some of the family moved farther into Kentucky, settling in the Frankfort area. Somewhere along the line in Virginia, there was a marriage or two that brought us into the Hatfield bloodline. For some reason, the family members in Virginia dropped the “c” and started spelling the name Slusher (possibly there were already some other branches of the family in the area who had been spelling it that way), while those in the Frankfort, Kentucky area dropped the extra “s” and began spelling it Slucher. Our immediate line were Lutherans and were staunchly opposed to slavery, but when the Civil War broke out, my great great grandfather served in the Confederate cavalry. I can only assume his reasons were his sense of sovereignty and loyalty to Virginia, his family’s original home, and possibly his ties to the Hatfield family. Whatever the reason, I’ve always felt his case serves as an example of one who, while being anti-slavery and obviously not owning any slaves, had different reasons for joining the Confederate forces. Being in Kentucky, most of our family on both my mother and father’s sides served in the Union forces, but we did have at least three ancestors who joined the South in their struggle for independence.

Please leave a comment and join the discussion!