A Review of Mercy Street: The Miniseries That Could Have Been Worse

Today we’re pleased to welcome guest author Paige Gibbons Backus, the Historic Site Manager for Ben Lomond Historic Site, a Civil War hospital museum located in Manassas, Virginia.

The Civil War is arguably one of the most studied subjects in American history. As a result, when the producers at PBS aired Mercy Street, a Civil War period drama set in the hospitals of Alexandria, Virginia, in 1862, there was already a line of historians and Civil War enthusiasts ready to criticize its historical accuracy. However, it is important for readers to keep in mind that this show was created with the general public in mind—for an audience without much knowledge of the Civil War or period medicine, and not for historians. While I have several issues with the show myself, when looking at the film historiography of the Civil War, Mercy Street by far has a better interpretation of the war than other television series, such as North and South, that come immediately to mind.

First of all, Mercy Street is an ambitious project for PBS. Alexandria in 1862 was a complicated place. Union and Confederate soldiers, male doctors, female nurses, Alexandria residents, and both free and enslaved African Americans were all living within the city, which undoubtedly created gender, racial, and political conflicts. In all of the previews and the premier episode of the series, Mercy Street primarily follows Nurse Mary Phinney (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), a New England nurse assigned to the Mansion House Hospital and Emma Green (Hannah James), a young Confederate woman whose family owns the Mansion House Hotel.

While this storyline provides audiences insight into the gender and political conflicts of the Civil War, Mercy Street also follows several different storylines: from Dr. Jed Foster’s morphine addiction; Anne Hastings’ (Tara Summers) and Dr. Byron Hales’ (Norbert Leo Butz) conspiring against Nurse Phinney; Silas Bullen’s (Wade William) abuse of a contraband laundress, Aurelia Johnson; James Green’s (Gary Cole) attempts to operate his business within an occupied city; and Thomas Fairfax’s (Cameron Monaghan) struggles with PTSD—and this list doesn’t even cover all of the storylines!

While I applaud PBS for trying to provide general audiences is insight to all of the levels of conflict of the Civil War, many of these storylines are not given the attention that they deserve, and as a result are oversimplified, making it easy for audiences to generalize and ignore the significance of the gender, racial, and political conflicts of the war.

While the storylines in Mercy Street are oversimplified, I will applaud the creators for paying attention to some historical details. Throughout the first few episodes, a few surgical procedures are filmed, including the emergency surgeries and a trephination (drilling a hole into a skull to alleviate pressure). I was very excited to see that Mercy Street did not fall into many of the prior myths associated with surgery during the Civil War: there were no soldiers biting bullets and anesthesia, including ether and chloroform, were used. Additionally, the small mention of key events, people, and issues—such as the battle of Williamsburg, the rounding up of contrabands, Dorothea Dix, and PTSD—can help place the series into a wider context of the war.

However, despite getting these few details correct, the creators tended to overlook historical detail and common sense for the sake of drama. For example, where were these wounded soldiers in Alexandria coming from? Throughout the hospitals of Alexandria, disease was much more prevalent than combat wounds—where is this representation? If a wounded soldier was brought into a hospital, do you really think he would have been allowed to bring a flag and staff with him? No. Think about the space it would have taken up and the inconvenience it would have caused.

Finally, I do not understand why it is so impossible for a costume designer to create historically accurate clothing for a television series. With so many images and fashion books available during the 1860s, there is no excuse for the disregard of historically accurate costuming.

It’s been a while since we’ve seen a television series focusing on the Civil War, let alone one that focuses on Civil War medicine. Mercy Street is not perfect—they try to cover much more than can decently be covered in six episodes and so miss some key historical details. However, I doubt there will ever be a historical drama that is perfect in the eyes of historians and enthusiasts. The series does a decent job providing insight to viewers about the complexity of the Civil War than miniseries in the past. If nothing else, hopefully the realistic surgery scenes and drama of the series will at least spark an interest in viewers to learn more about the history of Alexandria or medicine during the Civil War.

————

Paige Gibbons Backus is the Historic Site Manager for Ben Lomond Historic Site, a Civil War hospital museum located in Manassas, VA. She has a B.A. in Historic Preservation from the University of Mary Washington and a M.A. in History from George Mason University.

This entry was posted in Civil War in Pop Culture, Civilian, Common Soldier, Medical and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to A Review of Mercy Street: The Miniseries That Could Have Been Worse

  1. Dale Fishel says:

    I have watched episodes 1 & 2 and have enjoyed them; feel that they are capturing the mood of the time. My only comment at this point is that I could do with a few less parallel story lines to follow. Small criticism, I know.

  2. Ryan Quint says:

    I was skeptical of the flag bearer, too. Turns out it’s a true story from the hospital in Alexandria.

    http://mercystreetpbs.com/the-color-bearer-3/

    Fact is stranger than fiction.

  3. Betty says:

    I am really enjoying the series! And lo and behold, this Sunday the volume was ALMOST normal. I look forward to seeing the rest of it.

  4. Rob Orrison says:

    I still think the story of the color bearer is a tall tale…the notion that a Union soldier wounded on the Peninsula (Yorktown) was transported ALL the way to Alexandria with a flag and flag staff attached to his hands is a tall tale indeed

    • Ryan Quint says:

      The newspaper the story was published in came after 2nd Manassas, meaning the armies were a lot closer to Alexandria.

      The newspaper clipping noted the wounded man was from the 10th New York. The regimental historian of the 10th New York notes from Second Manassas, “Sergt. Albion Alexander, of Company K, who bore the United States color, was wounded but managed to escape the field with his charge.”

      • Bill Backus says:

        The story of Albion Alexander is an interesting one. Alexander Albion, along with the rest of the 10th New York, were fighting with the 5th New York along Chinn Ridge trying to stem Longstreet’s assault at 2nd Manassas. After withstanding the hurricane of fire being directed into them, the 10th New York began to give way. The state flag was captured by the Confederates, but to save the national flag, Alexander tore it from the staff, stuffed it in his jacket, and sprinted to the Union lines. Being wounded, Alexander and the hidden flag were then sent to a hospital. So while the first scene is based on an account, a lot of liberties were taken with it.

  5. Jim says:

    I’m with you Rob . . . smells a little too much like 19th-c. Victorian melodrama. The “mourning scene” afterward, with Taps being played, was also pretty misleading. As often as people were dying, their bodies being piled in “dead houses” that most hospitals had somewhere out back, there wasn’t much ceremony over any one person’s death.

    That being said, the producers repeatedly point out that this is a “history-based drama” not a documentary, so they have a bit more license to twist and turn the story to make it more emotional and more engaging, as people get to know each character and their role in the story. Despite its’ flaws, as Paige notes at the end, if it inspires a desire in people to want to come here and see the real places and learn the real history, then it’s done a valuable service.

  6. Kim says:

    Love that they are correcting several misconceptions of a time fraught with gray areas. Our history books have sacrificed truth for the sake of pol. correctness, something Lincoln tried to avoid to no avail. The south never carried the onus of sin alone — not with the New Englanders spearheading the slave trade, who went to great lengths to return runaway slaves as well as any free blacks they met along the way, and southern businesses who chose to hire blacks rather than enclave them were profiled in the series accurately. For 150 years the south has taken it on the chin as a section of the country sprung from evil. Time to grow up, Americans. Mercy Street isn’t perfect but as many lies that can be corrected in a short time? Go for it.

  7. Brize says:

    “Trepanation,” not “trephination.”

  8. Jan Shier says:

    Aurelia Johnson is played by actress Shalita Grant who has also been on CSI: New Orleans

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s