Book Review: Sexual Violence and American Slavery: The Making of a Rape Culture in the Antebellum South
Sexual Violence and American Slavery: The Making of a Rape Culture in the Antebellum South. By Shannon C. Eaves. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press, 2024. Softcover, 242 pp. $27.95.
Reviewed by Sheritta Bitikofer
Every so often, a historian comes along to tackle the difficult and unsavory facts about American history that many would rather sweep under the rug and forget. Those parts of our past that we cringe at nowadays, are what shaped our present, for better or worse. Shannon C. Eaves in her recent book, Sexual Violence and American Slavery: The Making of a Rape Culture in The Antebellum South, confronted such a topic and dragged it into the glaring light of analysis. Rather than defending the fact that rape and sexual harassment were the reality for enslaved women during the nineteenth century—because that has already been established by previous historians—Eaves breaks down the how and why of sexual violence of Southern slavery from the perspectives of those involved in the crimes as either perpetrators, bystanders, or accomplices. By doing so, she exposes the underbelly of how the Southern rape culture became so ingrained in the society of its time, laying bare its complexities, ironies, and perhaps another facet to the causality of Southern secession.
Each chapter presents the impact of sexual violence upon enslaved women from a different point of view and within different contexts. The first two examine how enslaved women were affected, how they coped with the all too brutal and cruel truth of what it meant to be a female trapped in chattel slavery and what it meant for the enslaved community as a whole. Not only did women have to deal with the trauma of rape at the hands of their white enslavers, but the total futility in resisting, preventing, or prosecuting the crimes committed against them. Some, like the infamous story of Celia, did fight back but at a fatal cost. Enslaved women were compelled to pass down cautionary tales and warnings to their daughters—who very well may have been the product of sexual violence themselves—in order to prepare them for the possibility or eventuality of rape at the hands of a white owner or overseer. In some instances, enslaved women became entangled—either willingly or not—in long-term sexual liaisons with their enslavers, giving birth to multiple children in the hopes that such a relationship would earn them privileges or even freedom.
Eaves further explains how those who were witnesses to this sexual violence were influenced. Enslaved men, for instance, were forced to endure the harassment of their wives, sisters, mothers, and daughters. This left indelible psychological scars, infringing upon their concepts of manhood and what it meant to be a protector and guardian within their families. As enslaved men, they were limited in their ability to shield their women from the advances and control of their enslavers. In some instances, as Eaves covers, enslaved men were ordered to commit or assist in sexual crimes, further deepening the impression upon the enslaved community as a whole.
One entire chapter is devoted to how the white enslavers who perpetrated these sexual crimes viewed themselves and their actions against enslaved women. Here, Eaves discloses how the ideology of Southern chivalry played a role in justifying sexual violence upon enslaved women. Established mythologies surrounding black women and their bodies became the foundation upon which white men built Southern rape culture, perpetuating images of their hypersexuality and that enslaved women were technically unrapable. Because of this, enslaved women became the objects of lust and sexual fixation. It did not help matters that many white men christened their sexuality in the slave quarters or houses of prostitution with “fancy girls” in order to save respectable white women from their peculiar sexual tastes and preferences. While white men were bound by the laws of social discretion, others were open and blatant about their sexual habits with enslaved women and adamantly defended their perceived right to do with them as they pleased. After all, they were considered property. Ultimately, the sexual control of enslaved women bolstered the institution of slavery, reinforcing the white man’s power and mastery over the black race. To give up slavery was to give up their access to black bodies, and vice versa.
Eaves goes on to explain in the final two chapters of her book, that white women were also tied to unwritten rules of discretion within their society to keep the unsavory acts of their white men behind closed doors. While gossip could barely be contained when mixed children resembling certain white men were undeniably visible to the general public, the actual sight of white men attached to black women crossed the line. This was often the grounds upon which white women petitioned for divorce. The plight of the enslaved women was not often the concern of the white mistress. If an enslaved woman who fell prey to their enslaver’s harassment attempted to find refuge in the white wives, they were often turned away, beaten out of a jealous rage, or sold off instead of protected. At the heart of it, a white woman’s prime concern when it came to the sexual violence committed upon enslaved women, was the preservation of Southern white supremacy by concealing the sexual preferences of their men as much as possible or conserving their own respectability within their communities. In an ironic twist, while men were looking to protect the honor of white Southern women by taking out their sexual indulgences upon enslaved women, they inadvertently insulted the honor of white women by explicitly favoring black women.
Sexual Violence and American Slavery is not a light read. The title itself serves as a disclaimer that those who might be triggered by the conversation of sexual violence should approach the topic with care. However, as weighty as it is, understanding how Southern rape culture and slavery went hand-in-hand through the nineteenth century is vital to comprehending race relations as a whole. Eaves supports her research with primary source documentation, such as diaries, interviews, letters, and court records. Equally as important as the words written by those who lived through this era, are the silences between lines. Numerous times, she brings it to the reader’s attention that enslaved women and men did not have a voice in certain circumstances, especially during the divorce proceedings when white women thrust the illicit sexual acts of their husbands into public light. However, in her research and this publication, Eaves admirably gave the voices back to the countless enslaved women who became victims of the Southern rape culture. Their stories and struggles are plain upon the pages of her book, doubtless to become an introductory reference for later studies to come.
Historians will one day look back in puzzlement over this period of American history – and how it treated history, namely, the BLM/CRT re-writing of Civil War era history in order to suit an incredibly small but loud and violent sector of the American populace whose openly stated goal was to overthrow the American government and destroy the country. Another aspect of this is the meshing of the Women’s Liberation Movement (“all of Western Society is about the rape and oppression of women”) with the CRT Maoist revisionism. They present many theories as factual history, citing few or no sources, and simultaneously wear blinders to facts that contravene or at least make uncomfortable their assertions. For example, whereas rape of course occurred in the antebellum South, and within the institution of slavery, it occurred amongst factory women and girls in the North at the same time, yet this is ignored. And a topic that is never discussed is the mass rape of women – white, black, slave, free – in the South by Federal soldiers during and after the Civil War. Silence signals approval, which is another problem with the Left, who produce such books. They use “murder” and “rape” etc. as weapons. They are not against them…when it’s happening to people they dislike. So, for example, “Palestinian” terrorist murder, infanticide, rape and pedophile rape of Israelis on October 7, 2023 was either “justified” or “never happened.” When you lie about history, you are no historian; you are a liar.
If you are concerned about something being “ignored,” by all means do the research, write it up, get it peer reviewed, and get it published. Be the change you wish to see.
Wow, what a cop-out stance to take. That’s like saying, “I’ve written a wonderful book about the use of PEDs in sports, naming all the baseball players who use them…except the guys on my favorite team, the Palucca Vultures. I like them, so their dopers get a pass.”
The responsibility for telling the whole truth lies with the people writing the initial book. Cherry-picking is not history – it is bias.
The University of North Carolina Press published this book, which is the same organization that publishes the landmark Civil War America series. Hardly the “Left who produce such books.”
https://uncpress.org/series/civil-war-america/
I agree with Ryan Quint’s comment. If you feel so strongly about the topic, you should take the time to gather facts, not talking points, and then publish your work.
My comment was more about writers than publishers, but now that you mention it… While writing my current book, in which a University of North Carolina graduate who served as an officer in a North Carolina regiment in the Civil War plays a prominent part, I contacted UNC for information on his academic record at the university, as well as any other information on him that they might have. UNC responded that because the man was a Confederate soldier, they refused to share any information on him. Fortunately, I am close with his descendants, quite prominent citizens, who are now using their leverage with university authorities to obtain information on their ancestor.
But of more serious concern, you must not have been paying attention to the news the past year, when UNC made it quite clear to the nation and the world that it had deep sympathies with the Hamas slaughter of Israelis and Americans on October 7, 2023; it sanctioned violent pro-Hamas, anti-US, anti-Israel and anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist demonstrations on its campus – refusing to have demonstrators who assaulted fellow students and university law enforcement officers and vandalized university property arrested – and made it clear that Jews would not be protected on its campus.
So yes, it’s clear in this case that the book was produced by an institution that follows pronounced Leftist ideology. As such, it is no surprise that they would produce a book that cherry-picks facts. And in this case, how prescient were my words in my original comment: “They [the Left] use murder and rape as weapons. They are not against them when it’s happening to people they dislike. So, for example, “Palestinian” terrorist murder, infanticide, rape and pedophile rape of Israelis on October 7, 2023 was either “justified” or “never happened.”
As such, my original comment rings even more correct and true: “Cherry-picking, or outright lying, is not history. When you lie about history, you are no historian; you are a liar.”
And as noted, it is not a historian’s job to produce books as replies to statements, articles and books that are inaccurate, dishonest or cherry-pick facts; rather, it is his job to point out such books and their biased aims so that such things do not become a trend. I had a great mentor when I was working on my first Masters in History, who made it clear to me: “Historians do not have opinions; they should only be about facts.” Sadly, for quite some time now in America, such things have become a trend, as the Left, in the public and private sectors, has suppressed opinion that disagrees with it, and intimidated historians and other writers into silence as it does things like rewrite and tear down Civil War history. This has been in the news as well – but I guess you missed this, too.
Thank you for this review Sheritta — can’t imagine this is an easy read, but I’m adding it to my (ever-growing) to be read list.
An eloquently written review on a topic from which many would avert their eyes. Thank you.
Thank you for the review Sheritta and raising awareness of this book that covers a difficult and neglected topic. I hope the work triggers further research into the experiences of enslaved females in 19th century America.
Thank you, Sheritta! This was a sobering and enlightening post.